有效固结应力法计算软土抗剪强度增量的偏差分析
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278171,51778211);中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(2017B20614)


Deviation analysis on the increment of shear strength of soft clay with the effective consolidation stress method
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对有效固结应力法计算土体抗剪强度增量公式中所包含的假设,结合室内等压固结和K0固结不排水三轴压缩试验摩尔应力圆示意图,将有效固结应力法公式与理论上更严谨的有效应力路径法公式做对比,分析有效固结应力法的计算偏差。结果发现:对于等压固结状态下的土体,有效固结应力法计算结果是准确的;而对于K0固结状态下的土体,有效固结应力法计算偏差与土体破坏时的孔隙水压力系数Af有关,土体Af取值不同,有效固结应力法计算结果既有可能偏大也有可能偏小。对于实际工程中常遇到的弱超固结软土,计算偏差在15%以内。

    Abstract:

    With regard to the assumption of the effective consolidated stress method, the method was compared with the effective stress path method which is more rigorous in theory, and the calculated deviations of the effective consolidated stress method were analyzed.The Mohr stress circle of indoor isobaric and K0 consolidated undrained triaxial compression tests were considered.It is found that the result calculated by the effective consolidated stress method is accurate for the soil under isobaric consolidated state, while for the soil under K0 consolidated state, the deviations are related to the pore pressure parameter Af when soil mass is destroyed.If the values of Af are different, the calculation might be larger or smaller.For overconsolidated soft clay in practical engineering, the deviation is less than 15%.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陆腾腾.有效固结应力法计算软土抗剪强度增量的偏差分析[J].河北工程大学自然版,2018,35(2):58-61,70

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-23
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-06-26
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码