拟动力地震边坡稳定性分析三维极限平衡Spencer法研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU457

基金项目:

宁夏自然科学基金资助项目(2023AAC03036);国家自然科学基金资助项目(52408373,52269015);宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目(2021BEG03023);宁夏高等学校一流学科建设资助项目(NXYLXK2021A03)


Three-Dimensional Limit Equilibrium Spencer Method for Stability Analysis of Quasi Dynamic Seismic Slopes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    将拟动力法和极限平衡三维Spencer法相结合,推导地震力和安全系数计算公式,并编写相应的计算程序,建立考虑波动效应的三维边坡稳定性分析方法,通过算例验证了该方法和程序的正确性。使用该方法分析了几何参数、土体参数及波动效应对边坡拟动力和拟静力安全系数及对两者之间差值的影响规律。研究结果表明:安全系数随坡高、坡角、破坏面宽度的增大而减小,且拟动力安全系数始终大于拟静力安全系数,两者之间的差值随坡高的增大而增大,随坡角和破坏面宽度的增大而减小;安全系数随黏聚力和内摩擦角的增大而增大,且拟动力安全系数始终大于拟静力安全系数,两者之间的差值随黏聚力和内摩擦角的增大而增大;安全系数随地震动系数的增大而增大,且拟动力安全系数始终大于拟静力安全系数,两者之间的差值随地震动系数的增大而增大。

    Abstract:

    Combining the pseudo dynamic method with the limit equilibrium three-dimensional Spencer method, the calculation formulas for seismic force and safety factor are derived, and corresponding calculation programs are written. A three-dimensional slope stability analysis method considering wave effects is established, and the correctness of the method and program is verified through numerical examples. This method was used to analyze the influence of geometric parameters, soil parameters, and wave effects on the pseudo dynamic and pseudo static safety factors of slopes, as well as the difference between the two. The research results show that the safety factor decreases with the increase of slope height, slope angle, and failure surface width, and the pseudo dynamic safety factor is always greater than the pseudo static safety factor. The difference between the two increases with the increase of slope height and decreases with the increase of slope angle and failure surface width; The safety factor increases with the increase of cohesion and internal friction angle, and the pseudo dynamic safety factor is always greater than the pseudo static safety factor. The difference between the two increases with the increase of cohesion and internal friction angle; The safety factor increases with the increase of ground vibration coefficient, and the pseudo dynamic safety factor is always greater than the pseudo static safety factor. The difference between the two increases with the increase of ground vibration coefficient.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

罗贵,万愉快,梁金航,丁朋朋,董旭光.拟动力地震边坡稳定性分析三维极限平衡Spencer法研究[J].河北工程大学自然版,2025,42(1):58-65

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-08
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-03-07
  • 出版日期: 2025-02-25
文章二维码