马克思视域下的自由
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

B0-0

基金项目:

国家社科基金重大项目(18ZDA001);教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(11JZD003)


Freedom from the perspective of marx
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    受限与自由并非截然对立,而是相互交错、辩证统一,这一点需从马克思的视角予以解析。人从动物进化而来,既有自然规定性需要,也有自我规定性需要。满足自然规定性需要的活动,哪怕出于主观自愿,依然不自由,满足自我规定性需要的活动才是自由的活动。自我规定性需要与自然规定性需要共存于一身,规范着自然规定性需要。若突破了自我规定性需要的管制,满足自然规定性需要的活动就是恶,限制作恶之人其实是帮其恢复自由,此时受限与自由就是同一的。除引起恶之外,自然规定性需要还能异化自由的活动。但人自我生成的本性一定能压制住恶,一定能克服异化,一定能使满足自我规定性需要的活动充实人类所有领域,这便是自由的实现。

    Abstract:

    Limitation and freedom are not diametrically opposed, but intertwined and dialectically unified, which needs to be analyzed from the perspective of Marx. Human beings evolved from animals and have both natural and self-stipulation needs. Activities that meet the needs of nature are not free, even if they are subjective and voluntary. Activities that meet the needs of self-stipulation are free activities. The self-stipulation needs coexist with the natural-stipulation needs and regulate the natural-stipulation needs. If we break through the regulation of self-stipulation needs, the activities to meet the natural-stipulation needs are evil, and restricting the perpetrators is actually to help them recover freedom. At this time, limitation and freedom are the same. In addition to causing evil, natural-stipulation needs can also alienate free activities. But the nature of man's self-generation must be able to suppress evil, overcome alienation, and fill all fields of human beings with activities that meet the needs of self-stipulation, which is the realization of freedom.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘文杰.马克思视域下的自由[J].河北工程大学学报社会科学版,2021,38(1):92-96

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-28
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-05-18
  • 出版日期: