保罗·利科的象征诠释——对弗洛伊德精神分析的批判
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

B5

基金项目:

辽宁省社科联项目(编号:2016LSLKTZIWX-11);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(编号:18YJA752001);大连理工大学基本科研业务费项目(编号:DUT17RW203)


Paul Ricoeur’s interpretation of symbol——Critique of Freud’s psychoanalysis
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    保罗·利科在象征诠释的研究中,对弗洛伊德的精神分析进行了详细地哲学阐述。通过对梦的象征诠释,利科对弗洛伊德的无意识系统进行了补充,并从梦出发,探究语言的象征结构,对语言进行源头上的思考。他从伦理的视角,深入分析了神话中所蕴含的象征结构和早期人类心理现象,得出"象征导致思想"的结论。利科对弗洛伊德精神分析的补充性诠释,不仅体现了其理论的包容性,同时也丰富了象征诠释的维度[1]

    Abstract:

    Paul Ricoeur had a detailed philosophical interpretation of Freud’s psychoanalysis in his study on interpretation of symbol. Through interpreting symbol on dream, Ricoeur supplemented the interpretation of "unconsciousness" proposed by Freud, based on which he concentrated on exploring the symbolic structure of language and had a further understanding of language from the source. With an ethical view, Ricoeur concluded that "symbol leads to thinking" from his analysis of symbolic structure in myth and human psychological phenomena in early times. The close relation between symbol and ethics needs philosophical reflection, which provides solutions to modern problems for us. Ricoeur’s supplementary interpretation of Freud’s psychoanalysis shows the inclusiveness of his theories; meanwhile, it helps enrich the dimension of the interpretation of symbol.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

丁蔓,门诗尧.保罗·利科的象征诠释——对弗洛伊德精神分析的批判[J].河北工程大学学报社会科学版,2021,38(2):97-102

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-10
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-07-12
  • 出版日期: