The unique operation logic and content construction of environmental administrative public interest litigation make it have a unique functional positioning. Through the multi-dimensional summary of 185 environmental administrative public interest litigation judgment documents in 2020, it can be found that the current environmental administrative public interest litigation in China is characterized by high success rate of procuratorial organs, major proportion of ecological environmental pollution cases, and large number of administrative omission cases. Due to the heavy and complex judicial reality of environmental cases, there are still many problems in the trial practice, such as the deviation of the single source of the cases from the diversification of the reality, the ambiguity of performance standards in cases and the unification of judicial trial standards, and the conflict between the formalization of case judgment results and the complication of handling environmental problems. The reason lies in the disadvantages of the rules and the operation of the various influencing factors. It is suggested to design countermeasures from the aspect of regulation construction and trial practice, respectively; in this sense, therefore, this paper attempts to provide suggestions to imrpove the status quo from the following aspects, namely, broadening the sources of case clues, clarifying the performance standards of administrative organs, and optimizing the types of judgment.